Interesting sticker, not sure how exactly to understand it though: is the point that the current army leadership is more interested in economic and territorial gains than in insuring that its ordinary soldiers, the vast majority of whom are killed are rural Americans (who, conveniently enough, no one hears about in the large metropoles) and the army could not give a damn about the lives they through into conflict?
Citizen, Yes to all of your comments. In a nutshell, I'm just saying one soldier should not die for this mess. I'm an old soldier, and I certainly wouldn't want to die from this.
Welcome, and thanks for the comment. Stay with us...we don't like stragglers! Jim
2 Comments:
Interesting sticker, not sure how exactly to understand it though: is the point that the current army leadership is more interested in economic and territorial gains than in insuring that its ordinary soldiers, the vast majority of whom are killed are rural Americans (who, conveniently enough, no one hears about in the large metropoles) and the army could not give a damn about the lives they through into conflict?
Citizen,
Yes to all of your comments. In a nutshell, I'm just saying one soldier should not die for this mess. I'm an old soldier, and I certainly wouldn't want to die from this.
Welcome, and thanks for the comment. Stay with us...we don't like stragglers! Jim
Post a Comment
<< Home