--Germany and Refugees,
Arend van Dam
Sufficient to have stood,
though free to fall
--Paradise Lost, John Milton
This isn't right.
It's not even wrong.
Subtitle: Duckspeak on the Prolefeed.
Ranger and I are growing tired of the Duckspeak on the Prolefeed
(thank you, Mr. Orwell
), specifically surrounding the latest immigration crisis. The wailing, the babies, the fences. We should all shed crocodile tears and open up the borders, yes? No, not really.
Why has the number of refugees the U.S has agreed to accept tripled in the ten days
since 10 September?
And why is the United States so enthusiastically encouraging the Europeans to open the floodgates?
The majority of these people are not political refugees fleeing for their lives.
They are instead, Discretionary Émigrés
seeking to illegally force their entree into cowed Western nations for economic and educational benefit. Discretionary emigrés following a discretionary war.
The photographs in the news show well-fed and well-dressed people vociferously demanding entrance, circumventing the legal protocol which all previous asylum-seekers have had to pursue.
We would not honor this mass exodus to those from persecuted African nations; in fact, Greece, Italy and the others ship them back.
So why the carte blanche to the Syrians, the Iraqis, et al.? Could it have something to do with the fact that their skin color is more in line with ours?
Sure, the U.S. has had a major hand in fomenting this madness by unleashing the roiling secularism which strongmen like Iraq's Saddam Hussein and Libya's Muammer Qadaffi had held under wraps, but that does not mean it or any other nation is responsible for setting these nations aright and instilling 21st century modes of behavior. Yes it was fatuous to imagine a garden of democracy would spring up in the desert wasteland, but our job, poorly-executed as it may have been, is done.
Perhaps the only people leaving their home countries who deserve the title "refugee" would be the Syrian and Iraqi Christians.
Much as Syria obliterated its Jewish population
in the decades before, so now is it attempting to purge this next group of undesirables.
The remaining refugees are largely Sunni or Shiite Muslims, and their internecine warfare is their own gift that keeps on giving. The U.S. removed the strongmen of the Middle East (Assad is still hanging on) as a gift to the peoples of those nations (said with some sarcasm
), with the thought was that the residents would now carve out their new heaven. That is what a people must do in their homeland, so why are these people leaving, and why is it our responsibility to house them?
No case has yet been made that the Islamic State (IS) is composed of dead-enders who are out of step with the population, and we straddle the fence. Either the populations of these countries don't like this form of "radical" Islam, or they are fine with it. If it is the former, they do not seem able or willing to step up to the plate (with massive U.S. aid) to confront their "nemesis".
Do we now recognize the IS as a new nation, a caliphate? If so, who will be defined as undesirables in that state?
This is the undefined moment for those who will not fight to exploit the guilt-laden Western nations, so the non-fighters are bolting -- and maybe some of the fighters, too.
Notice the appearance of most refugees
: Besides being well-fed and dressed, and the women all wear the Hijab, Niqab or burkha. These are not people renouncing their ways or clamoring for Western-style humanitarianism; if it were so, they would have had it at home.
But they all want to get beyond the Eastern European hard-scrabble lives which would await them in Serbia, Croatia and Hungary -- nations who do not want them, anyway -- to get to Germany and Scandinavia. They're not fools.
Are the emigres majority Sunni? Are they Shiite? Will they carry their long-standing racial and ethnic animus in to their new lands? For those who settle in the U.S., will they carry their resentments against the Great Satan? This is surely some kind of insane Mobius strip which, as we endeavor to rout out radical Islam in our midst, folds back upon itself and opens the floodgates to unvetted Muslims.
It's a nice day for Middle Easterners hedging their bets, and for having your cake and eating it, too.
[cross-posted @ milpub
Labels: exploitation of liberalism, Middle East emigres, non-humanitarian crisis, refugee crisis