Double Jeopardy
An election is coming. Universal peace is declared and the foxes have a sincere interest in prolonging the lives of the poultry
--T.S. Eliot
VFW magazine tells us the VA will soon be sharing an integrated electronic medical records system with the Department of Defense, though it could be 2012 before the system is fully operational ("VA, Military to Share Records," April 2007).
I suppose this is good news, but what happens when your records are lost, as invariably happens? Now both can lose your records at once, a double jeopardy of sorts. Next step: they'll put a chip in our asses, like cats at the veterinarian's. At least that won't fall out.
A few observations:
- Why is this not in effect right now? Veterans have been around for more than a few days.
- I'll bet good money that this projected system will not be operational within the stated time frame.
- The fact that this system is not on the ground right now shows that the government does not want an integrated system, as it will help to facilitate and increase the number of disability and combat-related Special Compensation claims processed. Short-stopping claims begins with the old records game, which effectively denies veterans the opportunity to prove their claims with official documents.
- The Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense must clarify their language to include combat related injuries that pre-date the CRSC date of 2003. The VA uses "service related rulings" and CRSC requires "combat-related" designators.
It is very difficult at present to fulfill the application requirements for many claims, but of special concern to me is the arcane CRSC determination process. This law needs to be cleaned up by increasing DoD and DVA cross referencing. If they were serious about awarding the CRSC benefit to all who qualify, that is.
3 Comments:
Claymore,
Please be advised that depression, anxiety, alcohol and drug abuse are the most common symptoms of PTSD. They're not the disease, they are only symptoms. And I fully understand your concerns; I know exactly what you're trying to convey to me, and I'm in your corner.
Re. a previous posting of yours,
There are worse things than losing an illegal war. If losing brings us back to reality than so much the better.
You're free to read SOF mag., but buy it at the newsstand for cash as their customer list is given to homeland security.
In addition, you should ask, "What can we possibly win, and at what ungodly cost?"
It's not a question of win or lose, but of hubris. America has no legitimate right to impose our political philosophy by force of arms.
Claymore,
Re. their questioning of you on weapons: You are the guy that has a tank with a 120 mm main gun, and several co-axle machine guns on board, so I reckon you can keep your rifle at home.
I'd take your tank away first; I'm more concerned about your tank than your personal rifle.
Claymore,
It's just that you talk like a tanker. So sorry.
What do you mean by "acting as infantry." Does this mean you belch and flatulate in polite company? Either you is, or you isn't.
Does PTSD" mean post-tanker stress disorder?
Post a Comment
<< Home