RANGER AGAINST WAR: Not Exactly God and Country. . . <

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

Not Exactly God and Country. . .


One of the myths of the Vietnam War was that the montagnards fought with the U.S. Special Forces because they loved the Green Berets and the love was reciprocal. The montagnards were primitive, but they weren't stupid. The French played the very same game, then left the "yards" holding the bag.

The montagnards fought not for love of the SF or the Republic of Vietnam. They fought because the SF provided training at the battalion level with corresponding weaponry. They were in effect planning for their eventual battle to free themselves from Vietnamese control, both North and South. This freedom movement was called FULRO and was actively and passively aided by SF actions.

Fast-forward 36 years to a military and a press which fails to grasp that military gains are meaningless unless the Iraqis form a true national consensus. Such a hoped-for consensus was the entire rationale behind the Surge. Our military was to cut slack so that the Iraqis could consolidate politically.

Barring that cohesion, our military can gain ground 'til the cows come home, but that won't effect a stable, effective legitimate government in Iraq. We are told that
U.S. forces are fighting them left and right -- against both Sunni and Shiite extremists -- and are "making strides," but what is the nature of these strides? "Waging successful battles" is not a yardstick of success.

Credited with the reduction in Iraqi violence over the past six months were "an influx of thousands of U.S. troops, and the formation of mostly Sunni groups of paid volunteers who agreed to battle al-Qaida for the United States military." "
Paid volunteers" is code for mercenaries.

So our newest battlefield asset is not a technological one, but a conventional one. These Sunni mercenaries are a centerpiece of our current COIN operations. The Sunnis effectively have been co-opted as a U.S.-controlled militia.


However, this militia, like the that of the montagnards before them, has no loyalty to or concept of a national government. The Sunni volunteers are there to get training, arms, body armor, commo gear and vehicles. This puts them outside the control of the Iraqi government, and the U.S. gladly obliges.


That the Sunnis are fighting "for the U.S. military" is not a hopeful sign for Iraqi national consensus, nor does it indicate any loyalty to the government of Iraq. They are actually fighting for themselves and their own unique tribal objectives.


The Sunnis are fighting al-Qaida in Mesopotamia simply because it is in their interests to do so. It is not because they have come around to the side of the U.S., nor because they are wedded to the concept of a united Iraq, contrary to the proclamations of George W. Bush.. Euphemistically, we would call this pragmatic behavior.

Labels: , , , ,

5 Comments:

Blogger The Minstrel Boy said...

very accurate assesment. i worked closely with the hmong and the meo tribesmen. affection came slowly, along with trust. the thing that bothered me most when they were abandoned to slaughter was that they had not trusted america, americans, or capitalism any more than they hated anything but oppression and outsiders.

they trusted me. my government, through me, lied.

that means i lied.

Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 7:40:00 PM GMT-5  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

MB, Yes but i guess it doesn't help if i say we were both too young to realize the full implication s of the lies. And we were.

Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 8:02:00 PM GMT-5  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jim, I agree we were all too young to realize the full implications of the lies and that's what really bothers me watching the young soldiers in todays US military. I support the troops yet a part of me says you guys should know better, yet we didn't. The indoctrination starts the first day of basic training and never really stops.

As far as al Qaeda in Iraq goes, our government would like us to believe that they are a major player so that they can continue this PWOT. It's something like less than 2% of the insurgency in Iraq are foreign fighters. There's a group called Islamic Front for Iraqi Resistance known as Jami that our government hasn't even acknowledged. They don't kill Iraqis and their goal is to drive out all foreign soldiers out of Iraq. They provide security and are active even in Anbar yet all we hear is al Qeada yet nationalistic groups like this are the ones that will decide how long we will be in Iraq.

Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 10:28:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

TW, US policy ignored the nationalists in VN and labelled them Communists.A broad brush indeed./The nationalists in Iraq will provide the real and legitimate leaders of the future./Even if a fighter is foreign this does not mean they are allied with AQ./The soldiers MUST believe the rhetoric or they'd end up crazy./I believe MB is being too tough on himself,we dummies are only guilty on the tactical level. All policy is strategic.Both were pissing up a rope , both then and now. jim

Friday, January 4, 2008 at 10:23:00 AM GMT-5  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As yet another member of that formerly young and dumb, but now old enough to know better crowd, I'm with Jim here. I knew my share of folks whose fates weren't good and I don't feel any better about it than anyone else. But I do know it wasn't my fault. I was in my 20s. Older and wiser people were supposed to know better. Now that I'm older and wiser, I know the futility of these grand adventures, which is why I've opposed much of the foolishness that's gone under this most foolish of presidents.

My old man—grievously wounded in WWII—always used to say that they should limit active participation in war—meaning actually being there, not cheerleading from a distance—to men over 40. He thought that might go a long way towards getting rid of war.

Parenthetically, my experiences as a younger man are the major reason why I always tell younger people that older people do not deserve any respect whatsoever by mere virtue of being survivors. I always tell 'em that respect must be earned, no matter what the age or the rank. I recall seeing something about that in that Officer's Guide that's packed away somewhere. It's also in my dad's 1943 edition.

Friday, January 4, 2008 at 11:16:00 PM GMT-5  

Post a Comment

<< Home