RANGER AGAINST WAR: The Euro Cave <

Sunday, January 14, 2007

The Euro Cave

What do the simple folk do
To help them escape when they're blue

When they're beset and besieged
The folk not noblessely obliged
However do they manage
To shed their weary lot

Oh, what do simple folk do
We do not?

--What do the Simple Folk Do? from the musical Camelot,
lyrics by Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe


Regarding the musical choice: while we do not have a JFK, we do have a king.

And nope, the title doesn't refer to that place to which most sensible Europeans have withdrawn in order to avoid participation in the Iraq conflict. The EuroCave is a "premier personal wine cellar."

The reason I mentioned it is because the advertisement caught my eye, as it was on page 2 of the
Wall Street Journal, following front page mention of the outrage GWB's surge met with, and the President's presentation of the Medal of Honor to yet another dead soldier's family, that of Marine Corporal Jason Dunham.

The EuroCave offers protection for your wines:
"Superior temperature, humidity and vibration control."

I wonder if the trucks and combat vehicles and quarters for our troops will provide the same protection for them. Somehow, I doubt it.
Well, the personnel carriers may lack the necessary protective armor, but thank goodness the well-being of the wine won't be compromised.

This is just one of those moments where you realize the vast separation between classes of Americans. The fiction is that we are a classless society. Unclassy I can buy, but not classless. We may not confer titles, but economic classism is alive and well.

Well, at least we know that Cpl. Dunham now has earned a protectecd and climate-controlled environment.

--by Lisa

6 Comments:

Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Claymore,

Not all our our soldiers are privileged to be a crew member of an M-1117 ASV, I'm sure.

Since on the topic of air conditioning, is it possible that this keeps the soldiers more closely bound to their vehicle (b/c they don't want to face the heat)? Jim suggests this comfort makes them more succeptible to IED attacks, as they are less likely to provide outer dismounted security for the vehicle.

Let's don't forget the 2 1/2 ton and 5-ton drivers. It's possible that they're air conditioned, but the last time I saw them they weren't.

Jim advises me that if he has access to the correct materials, he can destroy any vehicle that's in the inventory. Improvised munition and explosives are obviously not foreign to our adversaries.

Upon further discussion with Jim, he wonders how long it will be until Saggers (ATMs) and the like are introduced on to their side of the equation.

Your comments are appreciated,
Jim

Sunday, January 14, 2007 at 7:16:00 PM GMT-5  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Nubian consort comment seems like a cheap shot.

Sunday, January 14, 2007 at 11:50:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Orthoclase,

While I wrote the piece, Jim insited on the "Nubian consort" comment. As you will note, I also called our president a "king"-- which is another stab, but you did not take exception with that. Both comments are in the same vein, as both people are imperious in their conduct and demeanor.

It is reported recently that Ms. Rice expressed her gratitude for her FOX news reporters, who get the story right, according to her. This is laughable.

If we have an edge, we have learned that from the conservative media darlings like Ann Coulter. We doubt we have the meanness of spirit evidenced in the stuff spewn out by the right. But we're trying(!)

We're grateful for readers who read us that closely, as you did, Thanks.

Monday, January 15, 2007 at 12:50:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Lurch,

As always, you say what Jim means in a more concise manner. As a leader, it's always been difficult to force people to fill sandbags and to overcome the inertia of the troops.

The troops will protect themselves if leaderships provides them the opportunity to do so. If they're in an hurry, like in the Tillman case, they will not put out outer security.

Thanks Lurch for the supporting fire.

Monday, January 15, 2007 at 1:08:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Lurch,

I've never heard this stated as such. My ignorance--I did not know Newton was a fighting man. Clearly, he had his finger on the pulse, but just as clearly, a leg, as no planes yet. The only thing I've read in a similar vein is Murray's Rules for combat; I suppose yours is a corrolary.
As usual, you state things far more succintly than I.

p.s.--this goes to my old first sergeant, as they seem to share similar leadership. I remember his as 10 regulars.

Monday, January 15, 2007 at 4:24:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Claymore,
I generally agree that speed is security, except on convoy duty.
80 m.p.h. is irrelevent when you're escorting 5-ton vehicles.

We mustn't get bogged down in details here: the problem is, we're getting involved in combat power where the civilian population is the threat.

Combat power is irrelevant in a counterinsurgency scenario. I respect your viewpoint, which is combat-oriented, but mine is Special Operations-focused, addressing the counterinsurgency aspects. There is an overlap, but the bottom line is, the enemy is clearly the population that we are supposedly there to protect.

The above comments were from Jim, but as the writer, I believe we miss the main point, which is simply that the troops in the field aren't of the same socioeconomic class as those buying the EuroCave.

Monday, January 15, 2007 at 5:44:00 PM GMT-5  

Post a Comment

<< Home