RANGER AGAINST WAR: Not Tending to Our Garden <

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Not Tending to Our Garden

Ivy Icon We must cultivate our garden.
Voltaire (1758)

In the spirit of Voltaire's dictum to tend to your own garden, a recent Wall Street Journal editorial leaves me at a loss.

In "Getting Iraq to Work," Rudy Giuliani and Newt Gingrich argue that a portion of the $100 billion supplement which the Pentagon asked Congress to approve before Christmas be used "to create an Iraqi Citizen Job Corps, along the lines of FDR's civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) during the Great Depression. The Job Corps can operate under the supervision of our military and with its protection."


This in the midst of budgetary slashing of our stateside CCC equivalent, the Americorps Program.
Americorp's National Civilian Community Corps is suffering a cut of $22 million this year, leaving it to function on $5 million for the remainder of this year, after which time it will be phased out. (Two other AmeriCorps programs will remain.)

This money is peanuts compared to what we are losing in Iraq. The program provided tutoring for at-risk school children and built homes for the needy, among other services
, including environmental initiatives, something this administration finds little need of. Obviously, the needs of our own citizens take a back seat to GWB's pet programs. Our outlay in Iraq will provide no such goods for our own citizens.

An AmeriCorps worker earns an average stipend of $800/month to help cover living expenses in exchange for 38-40 hrs./wk of labor. The philosophy is that the worker will live in a sustenance fashion, in line with the community in which he serves. Volunteers have access to community health clinics for their medical needs, and can receive a modest food stamp stipend, around $100/month, as they will be living on the poverty line for the duration of their assignment, which lasts from one to two years, typically. At the termination of a two-year assignment, the volunteer earns $4,275 towards college education or debt repayment.

What a rare program, where both the worker and the recipient benefit. The expenditure is modest, and the outlay offers an exponential return.

AmeriCorps was President Clinton's pet project--a stateside Peace Corps--and for this reason has never been a darling of the Republicans, even after the "faith-based" initiatives were worked into the program. John McCain went to bat for the program early in this administration's term, but I do not see him stepping up to the plate now. This is yet another case of misplaced priorities.

--by Lisa

5 Comments:

Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Claymore,

The government always finds money for killing. I appreciate your service, but not everyone's cut out for the military. And that's as it should be; America is not Sparta.

All national service is laudable, and none of it is to be denigrated. Every job you can imagine furthers this country's well-being, maybe even Home Depot executives earning millions. But for my money, the guy mixing my paint and advising me on electrical matters is more important.

I have an illness which would preclude my joining the military. But I could tutor a child, and we must give that child all the tools we can. Very possibly one day he will be the one to "be all he can be."

Don't belittle someone b/c their earnings are humble. If they do an honest day's labor, then we need to look elsewhere to find the cause of the pay inequity.

Accepting $2,000 for finding a recruit is being a judas goat. We're not a military mouthpiece, case you hadn't noticed. Education benefits have not made you an educated man.

Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 2:47:00 PM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is ridiculous. If the US government wants to lavish all this money on Iraq, why not just annex the damn country and be done with it?

Friday, January 19, 2007 at 10:39:00 PM EST  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Truffle,

We annexed Texas, and nothing good came of that.
Thanks for reading.

Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 2:03:00 PM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not only that, but this Iraqi Job Corps sounds like a--what's the word?--socialist program. Why is socialism okay for Iraq but a big no-no here in the US?

Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 2:15:00 PM EST  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Truffle,

(And may I say how appropos it is that you've chosen to respond to this posting!)

I've been writing about this for a while. Actually, I believe the Iraqi program is closer to communism. I'd suggest you have your Senator or President explain this to you, in terms that we could understand.

The Republican party is so far on the right, that they're becoming leftists.

Thank you,
Jim

Monday, January 22, 2007 at 4:01:00 PM EST  

Post a Comment

<< Home