RANGER AGAINST WAR: Such Quantities of Sand... <

Monday, April 30, 2007

Such Quantities of Sand...

The poem on the Walrus and the Carpenter


The Walrus and the Carpenter
Were walking close at hand;

They wept like anything to see

Such quantities of sand:

"If this were only cleared away,"

They said, "it WOULD be grand!


--The Walrus and the Carpenter,
Through the Looking Glass
___________


So you can understand why they're sad, really. They see such potential...

New topic: Latrine etiquette among soldiers dictates you ''flush twice--it's a long way to the Pentagon.''

General Petraeus needs to flush twice so he can end up as Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army (''General Says Iraq Pullback Would Increase Violence.'') His rise is exponential, and will continue as he sings GWB's tune, which unfortunately is a bit off key; actually, more like nails on a chalkboard:

The top military commander in Iraq, Gen. David H. Petraeus, warned Thursday that an American troop pullback this fall would lead to an escalation in sectarian killings and worsening violence.

My sense is that there would be an increase in sectarian violence, a resumption of sectarian violence, were the presence of our forces and Iraqi forces at that time to be reduced,” General Petraeus said at a Pentagon news conference.


Does Gen. Petraeus have a crystal ball? Is he basing his comments on
sense, or nonsense. He's spouting the conventional wisdom (not) that keeps the U.S. mired ever deeper into this muck. It is time to flush this mess.

Although General Petraeus did not address the political debate over a withdrawal deadline in his briefing or in a later interview, he said there would be risks to beginning a troop pullout before the end of the year.

Ranger likes to keep things simple, and it seems that when Petraeus makes wild ass guesses (WAGS) about the future of Iraq, he is in fact trying to influence Congress. But this is not part of his job description.

General Petraeus also said that Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq lacked enough power to single-handedly push through measures sought by the United States that were aimed at easing tensions between Shiite and Sunni Arabs.

Aye, there's the rub, for the measures to unify this mess must not be sought by the U.S., but by the Iraqis. It must be borne in mind that the Iraqis did not invite our oh-so magnanimous attentions.

And [Petraeus] signaled that he hoped for political progress in Iraq, not just military improvements.

Yes, political progress would be refreshing, but why is this topic being addressed by Petraeus, and not Ms. Rice? Remember, Petraeus is military; Rice is political. The military commander is not the person to address the political needs of Iraq.

Let Petraeus do his job of killing people, and Rice do hers of facilitating a political accommodation.

Labels:

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Ranger and Lisa,

When I read the book "In the Company of Soldiers" - I felt torn about Petraeus.

A smart guy, well educated in military history. Evidence that he was willing to draw upon this knowledge base and maybe think outside the box a bit during his time in Mosul.

A smart guy, evidence of unconstricted thinking and now - access to the president of the U.S. (who is not a smart guy and appears to be a mono-rail thinker at best). I hoped for good things.

The other thing that I noticed in Atkinson's description of Petraeus, however, was Petraeus' desire to be "great." The desire to be "great" is a dangerous thing.

I still want to believe that he recognizes that there are different ways to be "great."

Like when September rolls around, if the 'surge' is not really yielding more significant accomplishments than significant setbacks, hopefully he will make good on his comment in one of his MSM interviews and say - "Hey, we gave it our best shot. The results of the 'surge' won't get any better than what we see right now and what we see now is not good enough. We're done here."

That would be great. Hopefully he sees it the same way. We'll see.

Monday, April 30, 2007 at 11:28:00 PM EST  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Hi KW,

From what I read, I saw Petraeus the same way as you.

But as Jim says, his newly minted fourth star is not won by butting heads. He must now toe the party line.

Lisa

Tuesday, May 1, 2007 at 1:23:00 AM EST  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

KW,

Good to hear from you. I never thought Petraeus could pull this thing out of the fire from day 1. Since I don't accept the hypothesis that we have any legitimacy in being there, so I cannot support anything connected to it.

Petraeus is the Gen. Almond of the Iraq war. It is a flawed undertaking from the get go. Truth cannot be squeezed from lies.

Tuesday, May 1, 2007 at 4:17:00 PM EST  

Post a Comment

<< Home