Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Sky King

From out of the clear blue of the

Western sky
comes... Sky King!

--My orders came through.

My squadron ships out tomorrow.

We're bombing the storage depots at Daiquiri at 1800 hours.

We're coming in from the north, below their radar.

--When will you be back?

--I can't tell you that. It's classified


Homeland Security Administration gets a lot wrong in its approach to countering the Terror threat to the U.S. The Air Marshal Service is a prime example.

Tennessee Rep. Jimmy Duncan quotes an 11/08
USA Today story on his webpage:

“Since 9/11, more than three dozen Federal air marshals have been charged with crimes, and hundreds more have been accused of misconduct. Cases range from drunken driving and domestic violence to aiding a human-trafficking ring and trying to smuggle explosives from Afghanistan.''

"Actually, there have been many more arrests of Federal air marshals than that story reported, quite a few for felony offenses. In fact, more air marshals have been arrested than the number of people arrested by air marshals (
Duncan Blasts "Useless" Air Marshal Service)."

Nice to know our tax dollars are supporting criminal enterprises beyond the mundane stealing of office pens. Rep. Duncan continues:

"We now have approximately 4,000 in the Federal Air Marshals Service, yet they have made an average of just 4.2 arrests a year since 2001. This comes out to an average of about one arrest a year per 1,000 employees.

"Now, let me make that clear. Their thousands of employees are not making one arrest per year each. They are averaging slightly over four arrests each year by the entire agency. In other words, we are spending approximately $200 million per arrest. Let me repeat that: we are spending approximately $200 million per arrest."

The cost per arrest is staggering, especially considering their low quality. Only three significant arrests since 9-11-2001, with only one conviction (Richard Reid).

Is there even a threat to our commercial aviation sector? If so, are Air Marshal the appropriate tool with which to counter the threat? Proper police and intel coordination linked with Transportation and Security Administration protocols should neutralize the threat before the security zone is penetrated by would-be hostile operatives.

The security system now has superfluous layers serving no obvious purpose. One example is screening for the components of liquid explosives which, even if smuggled aboard, could not be effectively combined to create an improvised mixture (unless a work area with scales were available.)

Explosives are not manufactured as easily as martinis that are shaken and not stirred. The realistic threat is not a James Bond type, contrary to the government hype. The types apprehended to date are pathetic, untrained crazies or wannabes posing theatrical threats -- they lack finely-honed operational skills. Yet this terror theater seems adequate to scare us witless.

The Rep questions the disparity between the threat and the scale of the U.S. response:

"Why, absent any evidence of a serious terror threat, is a war to on terror so enormous, so all-encompassing, and still expanding? The fundamental answer is that al Qaeda's most important accomplishment was not to hijack our planes but to hijack our political system.”

“For a multitude of politicians, interest groups and professional associations, corporations, media organizations, universities, local and State governments and Federal agency officials, the war on terror is now a major profit center, a funding bonanza, and a set of slogans and sound bites to be inserted into budget, grant, and contract proposals.''

After nearly a decade of the Phony War on Terror (PWOT ©) and 40 years of experience with international and transnational terrorists and state and non-state sponsored groups it would be reasonable to expect that our government would understand what are and are not realistic tactics for dealing with terrorism. Al-Qaeda is not our first rodeo.

Ranger remembers when "CT" (Communist Terrorist) was applied to the National Liberation Front/VC of the Republic of Vietnam, a label used to demonize their nationalist, anti-colonialist Communist efforts. It did not work then, and it will not work now. Sticks and stones...

Words are only words.

[Cross-posted @ MilPub]

Labels: , , , ,


Blogger The Minstrel Boy said...

the more i understand about this whole "pwot" thing, the more i become convinced that it was never anything but a scam.

from the pallets of missing cash in the immediate wake of the american invasion, through the allowing of bin laden to "slip" away from marines poised for his capture, the looting of bagdhad, the serial invasions, and occupations of fallujah (which were always followed by a "turning over" to iraqi forces that in short order required another invasion).

the most telling clue that this was nothing but a scam to enrich a very small group of insiders comes from the price of halliburton stocks.

while dick cheney was their CEO, their stock traded at a very solid, very stable rate, rarely below $38, rarely above $50. it did that for years. it was a good place to stash money you wanted to keep liquid at little or no risk.

once dick cheney became vice president and ginned up his stupid little "wars," halliburton stocks remained in pretty much the same price range, but, thanks to land office business supplying the logistics for the invasion, building the camps (both military and detention), the "no bid" contracts for rebuilding of shit we knocked down that mostly turned into doing no work beyond collecting the money, and their involvement with nearly every facet of the operation at immense profit, halliburton stocks split 6 times.

so, your 1997 five shares, split to ten, then to twenty, then to forty, then to eighty, then to one hundred and sixty shares.

you don't need to take graduate level statistics classes to realize that you simply cannot achieve that kind of return without a specific plan.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010 at 11:30:00 AM GMT-5  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

The whole thing does weave into a tapestry.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010 at 1:07:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger rogue trader said...

But, but, but it's just a few "bad apples."


Thursday, April 22, 2010 at 1:41:00 AM GMT-5  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home