RANGER AGAINST WAR: Do You Believe in Magic? <

Sunday, March 02, 2008

Do You Believe in Magic?


If you think we are worked by strings,

Like a Japanese marionette,

You don't understand these things:

It is simply Court etiquette

--The Gentlemen of Japan
, The Mikado

And it's magic, if the music is groovy

It makes you feel happy like an old-time movie

--Do You Believe in Magic?
The Lovin' Spoonful

There is no political solution

To our troubled evolution

Have no faith in constitution

There is no bloody revolution

--Spirits in the Material World,
Sting

____________

In "The Obama Delusion," the WaPo's Robert Samuelson charges Obama with boilerplate, "goody-bag" politics; nothing unusual, but certainly disingenuous for the man who's arrived on the Change Express. Samuelson says,

"The subtext of Obama's campaign is that his own life narrative -- to become the first African American president,
a huge milestone in the nation's journey from slavery -- can serve as a metaphor for other political stalemates. . . "

This statement confuses matters. Obama does not have a slavery pedigree. His father was a shoot-and-scoot African freely in the U.S., and Obama
pere freely spread his genetics in the best Darwinian sense.

The main point is, Obama does not arise from American slave stock. His blackness is not an American reality;
it is a campaign bullet point.

Samuelson continues,

"(O)n inspection, the metaphor is a mirage. Repudiating racism is not a magic cure-all for the nation's ills. The task requires independent ideas, and Obama has few. If you examine his agenda, it is completely ordinary, highly partisan, not candid and mostly unresponsive to many pressing national problems."

"The contrast between his broad rhetoric and his narrow agenda is stark, and yet the media -- preoccupied with the political "horse race" -- have treated his invocation of "change" as a serious idea rather than a shallow campaign slogan. He seems to have hypnotized much of the media and the public with his eloquence and the symbolism of his life story.
The result is a mass delusion that Obama is forthrightly engaging the nation's major problems when, so far, he isn't."

In a piece today on the Beatlemania phenomena that has become Obama rallies, Charlotte Allen poses the direct question,
"We Scream, We Swoon, How Dumb Can We Get?"

"(S)uch episodes of screaming, gushing and swooning make me wonder whether women -- I should say, 'we women,' of course -- aren't the weaker sex after all. Or even the stupid sex, our brains permanently occluded by random emotions, psychosomatic flailings and distraction by the superficial."

Of course, it is not women alone who have been swept into the machine. Maybe with the rising cost of all commodities, American are looking for added value, the super-sized meal, wherever they can find it.

The Doonesbury cartoon is reminiscent of a recent experience at a megachurch. The crowd was getting primed for the advent of the pastor via a rollicking music show featuring tunes which were both hypnotic and repetitive. "No more sorrow / no more pain / no more heartache, you are free," repeat, ad nauseum.

Many in the audience began twirling round and round, like dervishes. The pastor was absent that day, but his surrogate later lectured on the need for tithing. The best of the show was the narcotic-like repetition of the vacuous lyrics, which had the effect of inducing a mildly hallucinegenic experience.


Why choose a dull campaigner when you can have
politics + a rock concert? Multitasking -- it is the American way, right?

Labels: ,

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank God there are still some people in America who have not been "hypnotized" by Obama and who so far have not fallen into the "mass delusion".
An interesting point about the Beatles is that while all the screaming etc. seemed ridiculous the Beatles did in fact have the goods as history showed. While the crowd can certainly be wrong, sometimes the crowd is right.

Kevin in Granville

Sunday, March 2, 2008 at 4:17:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

Kevin,
There are always several ways to look at any event.I love the Beatles but would never vote for them if they ran for Queen.
They are either drug induced musicians or marvels. It's your pick. jim

Sunday, March 2, 2008 at 4:36:00 PM GMT-5  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, Jim, but this ain't the Beatles. This is a very intelligent and articulate man who's played the game within the rules and who has somehow struck a chord with a whole lot of people who aren't crazed teenagers. This is not a "delusion." It's for real and this man may very well be the next prez.

The number of whites that support Obama is very significant in many respects. Obama's candidacy shows that this nation isn't hopelessly racist after all; it may also aid in finally achieving full integration. The fact that so many people look past his color is pretty good news.

Don't think he's qualified? Or too young? Lincoln had less experience in public office. Kennedy was younger and he was not exactly an exemplary legislator in the Senate. The Constitution says you have to be 35, not 60 or 70.

Give this guy a chance before you write him off. Really listen to him. And ask yourself if he can be any worse than what he aims to replace.

And if you like Hillary, write her and ask why she's run such a terrible campaign, thus giving Obama the opening. And while you're at it, ask her how serving tea in the White House equates to all of this "experience" she so loudly proclaims. As I count it up, she's got seven years of relevant experience, in the Senate. Not a whole lot more than Obama. You want "experience," vote for McCain.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008 at 6:10:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger Lisa said...

Hi Publius,

He certainly can't be worse than what he would replace; a mule would not be worse.

People are more disenfranchised from their government than perhaps at any time previous. They want someone who appears to be
different.

I move that Obama is not totally different, no president can change things very much on his own anyway. Hillary certainly has experience as a politico, in the best, smarmiest, sense of the word. The experience card had been her undoing. We don't want someone experienced with all the muck we've seen.

It is not experience I look for, it is platform. Voting Obama does not indicate IMO the country is past racism. Quite the contrary; 80% of the black vote goes to Obama. I'd venture to say that if Obama looked like his Kenyan father, he would not get so many cross-over voters.

Racism on both sides of the fence is alive and well in America. Jefferson and others correctly fingered slavery as a blight which would dog this country for many centuries.

Obama has energized young voters, who think he is like them, and the liberal feel-good, privileged voters go Obama. Men who don't like women go Obama.

But the poor and marginalized members of society who need the Democratic social programs go unheard, as usual.

Unfortunately -- and I do think this is where sexism enters the picture -- a woman running for president is different enough on face value alone, and her hormones make her suspect out of the gate. (How many men do you know who feel entirely comfortable with and understand women?)

As Elizabeth Wurtzel said in the excellent WSJ piece, "Hillary Agonistes, "Once upon a lifetime ago, Hillary Clinton could have been Barack Obama!"

Her handlers packaged her as non-rad, obedient and predictable. Booor-ing.

This is the Survivor 3.0 set, and they haven't the time for someone not exotic. I believe that is what the race has devolved into: appearances. Americans never have been very rigorous thinkers, though.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008 at 7:05:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

publius,

Yes, Obama has hit a chord. But that does not a symphony make.

Friday, March 7, 2008 at 9:07:00 PM GMT-5  

Post a Comment

<< Home