RANGER AGAINST WAR: The End of our Rainbow <

Thursday, April 16, 2009

The End of our Rainbow


The problems of this world cannot be solved
by skeptics or cynics whose horizons are limited
by the obvious realities, but only by people

of vision, confidence, hope and imagination

--George Bernard Shaw

If you had had a sudden change of heart

I wish that you would tell me
so
don't leave me hangin' on the promises
you've got to let me know

--Where is the Love?
, Roberta Flack

Hate baby hate

When there's nothing left for you

You're only human

What can you do
?
--New Sensation
, INXS

________________

Re. the graphic: Yeah, right on. Classify this entry under "Culture Wars".

Sometimes my sap-meter just redlines. Tonight, in short order I was exposed to Trace Adkins'
Arlington (And every time I hear, twenty-one guns,/I know they brought another hero home, to us) and Susan Boyle's rendition of I Dreamed a Dream on "Britain's Got Talent". "And even Simon liked her," the new Good Housekeeping seal of approval. *Sigh*.

You can imagine the glurge that "Arlington" is about. Ms. Boyle is the case of a doughty and homely, never-been-kissed, "almost 48-year-old" who harrumphs onto stage to jeers, only to be embraced by the once-hostile audience for her heart-tugging rendition of Les Miz's "I Dreamed a Dream". All within three minutes, mind -- a new sensation!


The sturdy Ms. Boyle was interviewed, if you could call it that, this morning by once heavy-hitter Diane Sawyer who had to feign incredulity with the contrivance. Are we really this naive?

Who buys this pap? A woman who describes herself as "a garage" sings:
"There was a time, when men were kind/And their voices were soft/And their words were inviting," and the audience hops to its feet on cue, shrieking for this brave woman with the audacity to hope and sing of such things which were probably never her truth.

To dream the impossible dream. . .
And speaking of the audacity of hope, it seems Obama had lost his die-hard constituency in our fair city.

The day ended with a late trip to our local food co-op. Sensing I might be a subversive activist, one of the clerks approached me on the checkout line: "Did you hear, Obama will not bring charges against the torturers? This is the first time I have been deeply disappointed by my vote." Others rallied around concurring. A pall hung over this last redoubt of liberalism in Tallahassee; no one was wearing their Shepard Fairey tonight.


"Where is the change?" he asked glumly, to no one in particular. And that was our hope: That our nation would be reinstated as the bastion of freedom and
respect for human rights that it once was, before the Bush years tamped it down. The hope was that Obama would do a 180, and fully reject the abuses done in our name. A full rejection would require recognition of and amendment of those wrongs. Judicial review would be a part of that process, which has sadly been co-opted now.

In announcing that CIA operatives, including contractors, who followed Bush guidelines for torturing prisoners will not
be prosecuted for these actions, Obama launched a pre-emptive strike covering those who might plead the Nuremburg Defense (New Interrogation Details Emerge).

I'm still hopeful, but things seem less bright/shiny/clean with this executive decision.

Labels: , , , , ,

8 Comments:

Blogger Sherry Pasquarello said...

yeah, it does to me too.

Friday, April 17, 2009 at 9:42:00 AM GMT-5  
Anonymous sheerahkahn said...

It bums me too.
I want the truth out.
I can live with no charges, but what I cannot live with is turning a blind eye to what happened.
This needs to be dealt with, not swept under a carpet.
These people may escape criminal charges, but they still need to answer for their part in a criminal activity.

Friday, April 17, 2009 at 10:46:00 AM GMT-5  
Blogger TFLS said...

I too, am less hopefull. Obama's decision leaves me heartsore. Is he simply naïve? Does he really think pretending it all didn't happen will make everyone forget? Eventually another despot will sit in the Oval Office; it's the law of averages. What protections will be in place to prevent his (or her) being another Bush or worse?

About Susan Boyle - have you heard this by her: Cry Me a River. Just listen to the woman. A voice in a million. And to think it was almost lost because all anybody saw was how she looked. Christ! Whatever happened to the days of Kate Smith? No one cared about her looks - it was her voice that blew down walls.

Friday, April 17, 2009 at 4:58:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger Lisa said...

TFLS,

That's what I'M talkin' about! Sure, she's got a nice enough voice, but what about Kate Smith or Mahalia Jackson. It was the voice, not the body.

This was all purely scripted show, and the masses happily hop-to. What, are we so stunned that a fat broad can have a nice voice? (It's nice, it's not wowee exceptional.) This is galling.

Friday, April 17, 2009 at 8:12:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger FDChief said...

I've avoided the "Idol" business since its early days. I like my singers cool, dry and insinuating: Frank Sinatra before Vegas, Suzanne Vega after "Luka". Billie Holiday. Madeline Peyroux. Leonard Cohen. Paolo Conte.

I can't stand the throbbing-voice, hokey-chokey glurge that most power ballads - and 80% of the Idol singers can do nothing else - seem to demand ever since Whitney Houston pillaged and burned Dolly Parton's "I Will Always Love You".

Yikes.

And as for the rest...sigh. What can you say? Americans have always resisted the European attitude of cynical amusement about politics. We are like fourteen-year-olds in love; everything is drama, everything is either wonderful or horrible. Obama is either the Savior of Change or he is a horrible, horrible, awful disappointment of a man. We seem to have some sort of binary switch - we're either off or on, nothing in between.

Obama and his people are just a part of the immense power-money-and-patronage beast that is our Master. Much of the real power is elsewhere; in powerful and corrupt legislative caucuses, in insinuating lobbyists and commercial power players, in a thoroughly abased and corrupted "press" (to include the Beltway pundits).

Glenn Greenwald makes a good point: take the man for his actions, rather than making a sweeping judgment about whether he and his administration are "Good" or Bad". Releasing the torture memos, daylighting the subhuman scum who found contorted ways to recommend gulag tortures?

Good.

Refusing to consider investigating and prosecuting those who applied those memos, even though - forget the legal evasions, just as HUMANS - they must have known what they were doing was not just illegal but both a crime and a mistake?

Bad.

That the Obamaites will even acknowledge these crimes existed is an improvement over the Bushies, who grinned and repeated "We do not torture", like my son denying he had pissed on the floor while standing in front of the puddle of urine.

Is an improvement the end state?

No.

But it's a place to start. We all need to be Charles on this one - holding the Administration's feet to the fire to make them realize that it's NOT about them and their "change" - it's about the idea of a nation of laws, and that the law, in it's impartial majesty, forbids rich and poor, weak and powerful alike to steal bread, sleep under bridges and torture the helpless chattels in their charge.

Saturday, April 18, 2009 at 9:04:00 AM GMT-5  
Blogger Lisa said...

Chief,

First, I would be mortified if you thought I watched these programs. Not in a million years. "Cool, dry and insinuating" is the thing, and we have lost it.

Subtlety seems a quaint notion of a bygone era, when people knew the art of suggestion and flirtation, and every time I hear a Celine Dion or Mariah Carey belting it out, I cringe.

As for the politics, I love your description of a bipolar 14-year-old. We run hot or cold, and have lost the art of nuance even in our very perceptions. It is rather childish.

We should reject the cult of personality, and simply look at the discrete actions, as you suggest. Refusing to consider prosecution of torturers is a bad move on the chessboard.

Saturday, April 18, 2009 at 11:45:00 AM GMT-5  
Blogger Fasteddiez said...

Ahh, Lisa:

The cult of personality: a potent opiate. For your Pleasure.

Saturday, April 18, 2009 at 12:22:00 PM GMT-5  
Blogger Lisa said...

Fasteddiez,

Spot-on. You shall join Ghost Dansing as my two favorite culture vultures!

Saturday, April 18, 2009 at 12:50:00 PM GMT-5  

Post a Comment

<< Home