RANGER AGAINST WAR: Fiddler Crabs <

Sunday, April 05, 2009

Fiddler Crabs


We live in an age lit by lightning
After the flash we're blind again

--Over You
, T-Bone Burnett


Blessed are the peacemakers:

for they shall be called the children of God

--Matthew 5:9


Somebody, help me now

(I'll take you there)

Help me, y'all

(I'll take you there)

--I'll Take You There
,
The Staple Singers

________________

We support. . . fill in the blank.

American's reality has been condensed into bumper sticker slogans. It's all we have time for. It is a patriot's duty to have a flag lapel pin and a magnetized yellow ribbon.
However, the simplicity of our rhetoric fails to encompass our reality. Shibboleths do not substitute for rationale.

Ranger feels a free-floating anxiety when contemplating the changes occurring in the U.S. To say we are moving towards socialism is inadequate to the complexity of the problem.
All eyes are on the economy, but the bailouts are merely symptomatic of an underlying disease and are merely palliatives.

America has become a sound byte parody of what we once were. The dearth of rational thinking destroys the concept of democracy as the bailouts destroy the concept of capitalism, as practiced in the recently deceased U.S.A. (of blessed memory).


The slogans guide us, like, "Too Big to Fail." What does this mean?
Simply: The fat cats in government that grew fat through financial dirty dealings are bailing out the fat cats who are too big too fail, in a masturbatory cycle. The government and the financial houses are now interbred and have become common law partners.

The Obama bailout is exactly similar to Bush's. Paulson and Geithner are pressed from the same mold. The national treasury is being transferred in large part, and the voters have no control. It would be instructive to have a congressman -- any congressman -- discuss the long-term consequences of the success or failure of the bank bailouts.


It seems the U.S. government and the taxpayers have become underwriters for big finance, while the little guy is always one flush away from catastrophe. If the bailouts are successful, are our leaders going to break up the banking interests, or will it be business as usual until the next crisis? What is this griffin financial beast that has the government and taxpayers in a stranglehold?


Everybody wants the president to succeed, thereby allowing the nation to do so; to wish otherwise is absurd. But while the bank bailouts may help the bankers, it is not addressing the underlying systemic problem. It is time to get real and beyond any cult of personality. There are no national saviors.


Bush, Obama, et. al. are meaningless constructs re America. It is not the man that must succeed, but the nation. If the man falters, Congress must take the lead. Disturbingly, they have not shown that ability in the past eight years.


If Chrysler has a 60-day window to come up with a successful business plan, our leaders should be held to the same stricture.

Labels: , , ,

8 Comments:

Anonymous sheerahkahn said...

Defined by catchy phrases that can be placed on a bumper sticker for a quick read by a passing, bored driver looking for a chuckle or inspiration...no wonder we're a stupid people so easily taken advantage of...I've been casting about for something that I can write about, and I think I've found it.
Thanks Ranger.

Monday, April 6, 2009 at 10:22:00 AM EST  
Blogger The Minstrel Boy said...

it may all be moot in the end.

the first bailout printings of unbacked currency are doing their pig through the python magic on the system.

statistically we are very close to 1931.

that's bad.
very
bad.

Monday, April 6, 2009 at 11:59:00 AM EST  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

sheerahkhan,
Keep it less than 10 words.

MB,
With Bush we were in 1933 Germany and with O we're in 1931 Weimar Republic.That's progress.
jim

Monday, April 6, 2009 at 2:26:00 PM EST  
Blogger subrookie said...

I don't think the federal gov't should ever tell one company who their CEO is like they did with GM. I agree with you that there really is not much difference between our current and our previous President. Many promises are made during campaigns and once they are elected they migrate to the center.

I don't think we should leverage our childrens future by spending their tax dollars to bailout failing businesses. It wasn't that long ago Obama visited a company in Colorado that built electric cars. Employees of this firm had 3-4 weeks vacation a year and the company had a failing business model. In comes the US govt to bail them out. My company wouldn't work if they gave us 4 weeks off a year, why should we bail them out?

Monday, April 6, 2009 at 9:51:00 PM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's a little something that helps with why we are here. There was a blogger named London Banker that wrote about this also.
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html

The criminals are so deep we are doomed. Sad but this is what happen when the public are put to sleep by media.
jo6pac
Everything is on schedule, please move along.

Monday, April 6, 2009 at 9:59:00 PM EST  
Anonymous Grant L said...

Subrookie,

I don't think Obama is moving towards the center. He is basically doing exactly what he said he was going to do, and he's doing it quickly. If they don't do it quickly, it will all fall apart. We're nationalizing everything as far as I can tell because J.M. Keynes somehow managed to get recognized as the greatest economist ever when his ideas don't even make any sense.

Sometimes I just have to ask, where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?

Tuesday, April 7, 2009 at 1:36:00 PM EST  
Anonymous Publius said...

"I don't think the federal gov't should ever tell one company who their CEO is like they did with GM."

I do. Any company should lose its right to independence when it fails and has to beg for handouts from the taxpayers.

You don't really think that if your business was failing and I gave you a sizable chunk of $$ to keep it going, I'd be content with sitting back and watching you run it the same way you did before, do you?

If GM wanted to remain independent, they should have built better cars and managed their affairs better. Same goes for the financial institutions. The fed should have fired their CEOs, too.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009 at 10:23:00 PM EST  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

publius,
The best way to fire them is to let their corp go under. This is called capitalism.
jim

Wednesday, April 8, 2009 at 6:58:00 AM EST  

Post a Comment

<< Home