RANGER AGAINST WAR: Anti American Extremist Seeds <

Friday, June 19, 2009

Anti American Extremist Seeds


Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

Rage, rage against the dying of the light

--Do Not Go Gentle Into the Good Night,

Dylan Thomas

________________

Reading Mangold's and Penycate's "The Tunnels of Cu Chi" (1985) is like deju vu all over again.

The parallels to today's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are unmistakable and illustrative of a
military organization lacking institutional memory and operational adaptability.

The following quotes on actions 40+ years old could just as readily be applied to the Phony War on Terror (
PWOT ©) today:

"The Americans' concern for their dead and wounded remained a source of bewilderment and relief to the Communist soldiers. Anything that delayed the battle inevitably favored the weaker side and allowed reloading, regrouping and rethinking."

"The Americans came, as they always seemed to, shortly after eight in the morning."


"In fact, the explosions destroyed only some seventy feet of the tunnel complex, and the system was usable again within a few weeks."


"Everything he had learned about fighting seemed to have no relevance to what he had been doing today. . . . [W]hat did any of this have to do with an enemy you never saw alive, who existed in holes in the ground, and against whom only a man's brute strength and luck seemed to prevail?"


"Aircraft, bombs, artillery, and chemicals obliged the Viet Cong to live and fight underground."

"The tunnels evolved as the natural response of a poorly equipped and mainly local guerrilla army to mid-twentieth-century technological warfare.


"Professional soldiers, including the legendary Foreign Legion, had been defeated by an Asian guerrilla army -- a lesson for the future that few Americans heeded."


"However,
the peasants did not in the main have to be terrorized into acquiescence by such tactics. The Viet Cong were themselves villagers, or their sons an daughters, and operated most of the time with the consent and assistance of the people among whom they lived."

"Guerrillas hold the military initiative; the Viet Cong could choose the time and place of battle."
"For a guerrilla army, stalemate -- pinning down a larger force in its huge bases -- is equivalent to winning."

"But for the guerrillas there were often blood-debts to settle -- home villages bombed, relative killed, or arrested and tortured, by a government funded and armed by the U.S."

"Not only were they [the U.S.] easy targets for our snipers, but I realized the best way to kill them was with more booby traps."


"Throughout the war,booby traps were responsible for 11 % of all American deaths, and 17% of all wounds."


"The war occurred wherever opposing forces made contact."

"Large parts of South Vietnam could not be, and never were, secured."


"The Hamlet Evaluation System [HES] relied on suspect intelligence supplied by often corrupt ARVN local officials, who tended to portray the running of their areas of responsibility in the most flattering light."


"Twenty years earlier. Ho Chi Minh himself had warned the French, 'You can kill ten of my men for every one I kill of yours, but even at those odds, you will lose and I will win.'"

"Most of the Cu Chi district was under ARVN or American control by day, but the Viet Cong dominated it by night."


"Westmoreland remembered the advice given him in 1964 by [MacArthur]" To defeat the guerrilla, "you may have to resort to a scorched-earth policy."


"As usual in Vietnam, the brightest possible picture was painted in the after-action reports."
"[T]he army's sweeping through an area for a short time, only to allow the Viet Cong to move back in and resume their activities [was futile]."

"Even before the ground war in Vietnam had begun to settle down into one of grinding attrition -- a strategy that is proof of a lack of strategy -- the Americans had already begun to rely heavily on their overwhelming superiority in weapons technology."

Labels: , , , , , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger The Minstrel Boy said...

one of the lessons i have had to learn, bitterly, and almost against my will is that the entire U.S. involvement was a mistake, a fraud, and an entirely avoidable waste from start to finish.

every now and there there would be an officer, or a politician who would sense, see, and fatally speak the truth about vietnam. usually, like john paul vann, the officers were cashiered, or if they spoke out after having left the service, like john kerry, or bob kerrey, they were subject to the most odious forms of character assination their opponents had means to fling.

to take a living recipient of the medal of honor, like bob kerrey, or to cast aspersions on the "validity" of john kerry's wounds is reprehensible.

but, the truth that nobody was allowed to speak, the truth that john mcCain held onto under unspeakable torture (on account of they weren't interested in the truth, they wanted his bullshit confession) was that the entire gulf of tonkin "incident" was a lie. a lie told to justify military escalations which were already being done.

the tunnels were little spots of hell. vermin infested, small, dark, filthy, soggy, horrid, horrid nightmares.

we never stood a chance in vietnam, mainly because nobody really understood what the fuck we were supposed to be doing. no goal, no plan, no exit.

sound familiar? yep. it sure does.

when agelina jolie adopted her latest child from vietnam i remarked to a friend:

"watch, in 30 years she's going to adopt and iraqi kid and make all the same fucking mistakes."

Friday, June 19, 2009 at 10:50:00 PM EST  
Blogger rangeragainstwar said...

MB,
It's good to hear from you, I was worried that you had jumped ship.
Which war are you calling a fraud? Both the PWOT and RVN were corruptions of democratic thought.

This is a tough thing to say but my view is that ALL upheavals that the US faced in the 20/21 centuries were a result of Colonialism-of the French/British. They reaped the rewards and we shed the blood after the fact.

I make these entries b/c they are so clear to my way of thinking BUT THE NCA JUST DOESN'T GET IT.!
jim

Saturday, June 20, 2009 at 6:27:00 AM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I forget where I heard this but this is what I remember.

Two journalists are flying in a Huey in Vietnam and VC are shooting arrows at the chopper. One journalist says, "how can you lose to someone who shots arrows at a chopper?" The other journalist replied, "how can you defeat someone who would shoot arrows at a chopper?"

Saturday, June 20, 2009 at 1:12:00 PM EST  

Post a Comment

<< Home