Kansas Preacher Man

 

He who is without sin among you,
let him be the first to throw a stone 
--John 8:7 

A half truth is a whole lie
--Yiddish proverb

 The evil that men do lives after them; 
the good is oft interred with their bones 
--Julius Ceasar (III, ii)
 __________________

We don't know Rev. Fred Phelps from Adam, and do not hawk any particular dogma. But we are interested in the way media presents events.

In our outraged society, the death of Kansas preacher Fred Phelps must call for celebration -- a blot of medieval backwardness has been removed from the planet. Mr. Phelps gained infamy for his pronouncements that the United States' pro-homosexual stance was bringing the wrath of God down upon it, and his protests at military funerals gained him no love from that community of mourners.

A WaPo piece on his death even endeavored to take the high road by suggesting that imminent posts by Facebookers and Twitterers not dance on his grave, as that might be bad form. But what the Post failed to provide readers was a balanced obituary for this easy-to-dislike man, which would have provided real grist for such a request.

Missing was the momentous first half of this attorney-cum-preacher's life, in which he was one of the only private attorney's in early 1960's Kansas who would advocate for the civil rights of its black citizens, and he was successful in a big way. As a Christian, Phelps found racial bias unpalatable and against the word of God. All men are made in God's image; that's what his Good Book said. He could not brook their second-class status, and he moved against prejudice in a meaningful way.

You may call him a demogogue, but this was a man of action and not solely words who behaved in accordance with his beliefs. According to his moral guidebook, marriage was between men and women, and recent moves to force gay marriage in church were an an abomination. He didn't create his viewpoint, but was guided by the Christian rulebook, a book which has provided the foundation for many of our laws. Playing by those rules, his positions were consonant throughout his public life. 

Gay rights is the cause du jour -- the last frontier of the civil rights movement -- and this time, Phelps was on the wrong side of public opinion. Monster (on gay marriage) / savior (black civil rights). Demagogue / demigod. Like Ella Fitzgerald sang, " 'taint what you do, it's the way that you do it," and Phelps' approach was far from politic.

However, it is futility to expect the State to attempt to coerce the Church to believe otherwise on the gay marriage issue. Our Founders were wise enough to separate the two spheres. But separation does not imply smashing the institution. We are not Communistic, and those who would condemn religionists are as intolerant as those they would condemn. Live and let live is the ideal.

The whole truth of the man's life is complex, not so easily dismissed in a 120 character tweeted diatribe. Had the Post presented a complete obituary, they would have to forgo their saintliness, and we would have to forgo our desire for outrage and easily understood stories.

Complexities require thought.

Mirror Image

even though we lived on beans and mush and weenies
when we sat down to eat, he said,
"not everybody can eat like this."

and because he wanted to be rich
or because he actually thought he was rich
he always voted Republican
--Father, Charles Bukowski

We are all murderers and prostitutes --
no matter what culture, society, class, nation one belongs,
no matter how normal, moral, or mature
one takes oneself to be
--R.D. Laing

If you talk to God, you are praying.
If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia
--Thomas Szasz

Dear Mummy, Dear Daddy,
Now I'm nineteen as you see,
I'm handsome, tall, and strong.
So what the hell gives you the right to look at me,
As if to say "Hell, what went wrong?"
--Bad Boys, Wham!
_____________________

Years ago -- more than are comfortable to remember -- Ranger learned a factoid about schizophrenics in a college counseling course that pertains to the U.S. citzenry today.

Schizophrenics are unable to identify their own bodies when tasked to identify themselves in a photo lineup. So disconnected are they from reality (or at least, perceived reality) that they cannot make this connection. Some otherwise normal people suffer "face blindness" (prosopagnosia), and fail to recognize themselves or others. As a society, it seems we share in this morphological disconnect.

A recent U.S. foreign policy initiative is to ensure gay rights on the international scene:

The Obama administration announced on Tuesday that the United States would use all the tools of American diplomacy, including the potent enticement of foreign aid, to promote gay rights around the world (U.S. to Aid Gay Rights Abroad, Obama and Clinton Say.)

This would be fair and equitable in an alternative universe, but how does this relate to ours? How can the U.S. force this initiative upon the world when we are so conflicted about the rights of gays at home? That's spelled h-y-p-o-c-r-i-s-y, folks.

Republican front-runner Rick Santorum just mistakenly compared gay marriage to polygamy. The military just rescinded "Don't ask, Don't Tell", and many cases like those of decorated aviator 18-year aviator Lt. Col. Victor Fehrenbach forced out of service due to his sexual orientation remain to be resolved. It took the U.S. 17 years to repeal DADT, and 220 years to end the prohibition of gays serving openly in the military, yet -- whammo! -- now we are the moral arbiters on all issues gay?

The issue of civil unions or marriage for gay couples remains highly contentious, as does everything issuing from that, including inheritance issues and deathbed rights to shared medical coverage for cohabiting partners.

A large portion of our society believes God does not approve of homosexuals, and certainly not of their coupling; may as well betroth Vietnamese pigs, far as they're concerned. For these people, how does their Christianity comport with the spreading of an ethos abroad in which they themselves do not believe? Do we view the rest of the world with disdain, and figure the heathens should "tolerate" what we reject?

May gays marry? Adopt children? Can they practice sodomy in all states? Is this rightly even a state or a federal issue? Do we as a society endorse the state department policy (outside of Portlandia?) Are our taxes earmarked to support gay rights issues?

Even if the goal is understandable, the mirror image is unrecognizable.