Pardon Me

Opponent, Pavel Constantin

Excuse me! I feel good tonight, because, uh. . .
well, I've finally got a goal in life, and that's. . .
that's what pleases me, is to be able to have a goal,
and this is why I'm so happy
--SNL, Steve Martin (1978)

Some times are happy, some not happy. . .
But the idea of being able to serve a nation you love is --
has been joyful. In other words,
my spirits have never been down
--George W. Bush (2008)
______________

Recent talk of presidential pardons centers around the actors who brought you the wildly distracting Phony War on Terror (PWOT ©) (Preemptive Pardons.)

The speculation is that Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Justice (DoJ) and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and their contractors may receive a blanket pardon for committing torture, in violation of the Geneva Conventions (In Defense of Pardons.) The intention is to alleviate their chances of being tried in the U.S. for War Crimes.

CIA/U.S. policy of secret prison sites is probably still operational, but the concept of preventive incarceration is as felonious and ineffectual as preemptive invasions. Both policies are weak-minded and counter-productive, yet We the People countenance these illegalities.

As a follow on to yesterday's Terrorists are People, Too, consider the cases of sad sack detainee Jose Padilla and "American Taliban" John Walker Lindh.

No Mr. Klar here, just a couple of zhlubs trying to make it on the other side of capitalism. Unlike convicted killer Klar, neither Lindh nor Padilla can be proven to have ever killed an American, yet they both received proportionally heavier sentences than did Klar.

Let us hope that the entire DoJ approach to terror criminals will be reevaluated in this new administration. In this spirit, why not pardon Jose Padilla and John Walker Lindh? Both men should be considered for parole.

Of course, this will never happen. We need poster boys.

And goodies like pardons don't trickle down far into shallow pockets.

Junkyard Dogs

Behind the ostensible government
sits enthroned an invisible government
owing no allegiance and acknowledging
no responsibility to the people
--Theodore Roosevelt

Criticism in a time of war is essential

to the maintenance of any kind of democratic government
--Sen. Robert Taft, (R) Ohio

And it's bad, bad Leroy Brown
The baddest man in the whole damn town,
Badder than old King Kong
And meaner than a junkyard dog
--Bad, Bad Leroy Brown, Jim Croce
__________________

For the purpose of this article, let's assume that Jose Padilla is the worst terrorist that ever targeted Americans, and is the spawn of the devil. In other words, he is a really bad guy, and we shouldn't like him, not even one jot. O.k., so now I stand convinced.

Yet there remains an area of disjunction between Mr. Padilla's evilness and his treatment in U.S. custody.

Mr. Padilla was arrested in May, 2002. Yes, Mabel, he was arrested. This is an uncontested legal term, entailing certain actions to follow. Nobody contests the fact or date of arrest. So there is no fog here.

But somehow, in violation of or ignorance of the law, he was transferred to a military brig. To the best of my knowledge, there is no basis in law in 2002 for a federal law enforcement agency to relinquish an arrested individual to the military. What federal code authorized this action?

Federal law enforcement can transfer AWOL and deserters to Department of Defense custody, but Padilla is a passport-carrying U.S. citizen, and his case should be granted dismissal due to denial of a speedy trial. The clock for determining hastiness of trial should start when you are arrested, not when you are released from non-habeus corpus illegal detention.

Yet a federal judge refused to dismiss charges last week, saying that Mr. Padilla's 3 1/2 years isolated in a Navy brig "did not count because he had not been charged" (Judge Reatains Terror Counts for Padilla, NYT, 3/24/07.)

The judge claimed that criminal charges only arose in 2005, when Padilla was added to an indictment here involving terrorism support. "Only then did the clock start for the Sixth Amendment right to a 'speedy and public trial,' Judge [Marcia] Cooke said."

It seems that the function of the court has been perverted to protect the administration, and not the Constitution. Justice and legality no longer seem to be the sole purpose of the federal court system; permitting the agenda of this administration to prevail at any cost, does.

If this denial of rights can be imposed upon Padilla, it can be done to the rest of the boys and girls in the neighborhood, or barrio. In fact, Mr. Rogers himself is also in danger. Cardigans--even mohair ones--don't let you off this hook.